To that end, they invited the University of Maryland Applied Research Lab for Intelligence and Security to help review the 517th Training Group’s goals for personalized instruction. “We asked, ‘What does an updated and modern learning environment look like and what can we do to improve our students' outcomes and subsequent mission effectiveness?" “We took a novel approach to problem solving,” said Julie Cantwell, the technical director for the 517th Training Group at DLIFLC and organizer for the event. 15-17, which brought experts from other governmental groups, academia, and industry “to examine and challenge the status quo of linguist training, and provide foundational research to jumpstart the Linguist Next initiative,” according to information released at the event. That set the stage for The Foreign Language Design Sprint, an event held at the Presidio of Monterey Oct. “The goal for Linguist Next, similar to what was applied for Pilot Training Next, is to decouple the time component from the competency component in order to produce skilled language analysts for the mission,” explained High. One of those is the foreign language community. “The Air Force instituted a widespread push for innovation of existing programs across the service,” explained High, adding that they’ve highlighted three crucial fields to focus their efforts and provide funding. This has inspired other training groups to revisit their training to find out if they can improve learning efficiency as well. They were able to consistently repeat the successful results, and now have what they call a “Pilot Training Next” program. After some creative and informed risk-taking, High said, they succeeded and cut in half the time it takes to train a pilot to the same level of skill. The Air Force began an experiment in its pilot training pipeline. Could they shorten the training timeline and get the pilots into the regular Air Force in a timelier manner while still maintaining a high level of competency? However, several years ago the Air Force began to question if it were really necessary to spend a year in training, or if advances in learning science and technology could change the structure to be more efficient. “The assumption being that that’s how long it takes to train someone to become a competent pilot.” Jesse High, a DLIFLC Office of Standardization and Academic Excellence noncommissioned officer in charge at the 311th Training Squadron. “For years the Air Force pilot training was a year long,” explained Master Sgt. Language training at the Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center, on the other hand, has seen a sea of change in the last several years, none stronger than the Air Force’s Linguist Next program. The old adage, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” is alive and well in the military services. MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA - Training for the military tends to follow the same model with little change.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |